• HOME
  • solutions
    • RECURSION ANALYZERS
    • Mortgage Company Data
    • Recursion DataCloud
    • Customized Solutions
  • BLOG
  • CLIENT LOGIN
    • Recursion Analyzers
  • ABOUT US
    • OVERVIEW
    • OUR TEAM
    • News & Events >
      • Recursion In News
      • Recursion Data Citations
  • CONTACT
RECURSION CO
  • HOME
  • solutions
    • RECURSION ANALYZERS
    • Mortgage Company Data
    • Recursion DataCloud
    • Customized Solutions
  • BLOG
  • CLIENT LOGIN
    • Recursion Analyzers
  • ABOUT US
    • OVERVIEW
    • OUR TEAM
    • News & Events >
      • Recursion In News
      • Recursion Data Citations
  • CONTACT
BLOG

Conforming Mortgage Performance by Seller Type

6/22/2021

 
We received the first loan-level performance data for the GSE’s a few months ago, so it’s about time to see what tentative observations can be drawn from this new data set. As a popular theme for this blog is the bank/nonbank share this seems a good place to start. In general, we have noticed that nonbank DQ’s tend to be higher than those for banks, and that this distinction is correlated with the relatively more generous credit terms available in the nonbank sector. Below find a table that demonstrates this for 2018 and 2019 vintage mortgages:
Picture
This can be summarized:
Picture
Run Underlying Query
Higher DQ’s for nonbanks relative to banks is associated with looser relative underwriting standards for nonbanks regarding credit score, DTI and LTV, with the exception of LTV for the 2019 vintage.
​
An additional potential consideration to explain the performance difference has to do with underwriting quality. That is, in any given credit bucket do banks outperform nonbanks? There are many ways to slice this data to get to this issue, but as a first try let’s break down performance into credit score buckets and look at performance and distribution of market volumes across these categories for the two vintages.
Picture
Run Underlying Query
Picture
Run Underlying Query
Both vintages are interesting in their own right but even more notable are the differences between the two years. In 2018, nonbanks had a higher share of their mortgage production in the credit score range of 620-740 while banks focused on higher credit score borrowers. This was somewhat offset by worse performance on the part of banks at the very lowest credit category relative to nonbanks.

By 2019, the distribution of credit scores had become nearly identical across the two seller types, but nonbanks distinctly underperformed banks at the low end of the credit distribution.
​
The tentative takeaway here is that the performance difference over time between banks and nonbanks reflects changes in market conditions. 2018 was a high mortgage rate year, so to gain share, nonbanks looked to the lower credit score cohorts to enhance their businesses. But at least at the very risky tail of the distribution, they were more careful. 2019 saw the start of a slide in mortgage rates, implying there was plenty of business across borrower segments, so nonbanks could grow by using their technological advantage and lower regulatory costs to their advantage without having to rely on a larger share of low-credit quality borrowers. The pace of growth may have been such that performance at the low end started to slip.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019

    Tags

    All
    Affordability
    ARM
    Bank\Nonbank
    Borrower Assistant Plan
    Cash Window
    Climate Change
    CMBS
    CMO
    Conforming Loan
    Conventional Loan
    COVID 19
    CPR\CDR\CRR\CCR
    Credit Score\DTI\LTV
    CRT\CAS\STACR
    Delinquency
    Early Buyout
    Early Payment Default
    ESG
    ET Pools
    Fannie Mae
    Fed
    FHA
    FHFA
    Forbearance
    Foreclosure
    Foreign Investor
    Freddie Mac
    Ginnie Mae
    Green Loans
    HECM
    HELOC
    HMDA
    HUD
    LMI
    Manufactured Housing
    Modified Loans
    MSR
    Multifamily
    Occupancy Type\NOO
    Partial Claim
    Payoff
    PIW
    Prepayment
    Purchase Loans
    Recursion In News
    Refi Loans
    Reperforming
    RG Pools
    Rural Housing
    Single Family
    Special Eligibility Program
    TBA Market
    TIC
    TPO
    UMBS
    US Treasury
    VA

RECURSION

SOLUTIONS ​
Recursion Analyzers
​
Mortgage Company Data
Recursion DataCloud
Customized Solutions


ABOUT US  ​
Overview
​Our team
CLIENT LOGIN   ​
Recursion Analyzers

CONTACT

224 West 30th St., Suite 303, New York, NY 10001
Contact Us

Picture
Copyright © 2022 Recursion, Co. All rights reserved.​
  • HOME
  • solutions
    • RECURSION ANALYZERS
    • Mortgage Company Data
    • Recursion DataCloud
    • Customized Solutions
  • BLOG
  • CLIENT LOGIN
    • Recursion Analyzers
  • ABOUT US
    • OVERVIEW
    • OUR TEAM
    • News & Events >
      • Recursion In News
      • Recursion Data Citations
  • CONTACT